Archaeological Theory
Dr. Kantner's contributions to archaeological theory focus on how biological evolutionary theory can be applied to archaeological problems, including comparisons of cultural vs. biological evolutionary processes and microeconomic vs. evolutionary game theory. Understanding human behavior is hard enough when working with living populations; it would seem to be that much harder to deal with people who lived hundreds or thousands of years ago. Dr. Kantner is therefore also interested in how modeling techniques used by human behavioral ecologists can be adapted to looking at complex prehistoric behavior. A sample of his writings on these topics is provided below:
Journal Articles
 |
A 2008 article in the Journal of Archaeological Research provides a critical update on regional archaeology, a theoretical and methodological approach to understanding the past that was especially popular in the 1970s and 1980s. Dr. Kantner explores how the premise of regional archaeology -- that the past can only be understood by looking at social and environmental phenomena across regional space -- today informs most archaeological research. On the other hand, the specific methods of regional analysis have not held up to analytical scrutiny. Both conclusions challenge the utility of distinguishing regional archaeology as a unique area of inquiry. |
Book Chapters
  |
Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory (2003) includes a chapter that considers different manifestations of biological evolutionary theory in archaeology -- adaptationism, selectionism, and human behavioral ecology -- and argues that the latter most effectively acknowledges the distinct decision-making capabilities of humans, which serves as an evolved proxy for the slow, painful process of natural selection. |
  |
This 2002 book, Darwin and Archaeology: A Handbook of Key Concepts in Modern Evolutionary Archaeology, was edited by John Edward Terrell and John Hart. It includes Dr. Kantner's chapter on the concept of "complexity," a concept used in a multitude of disciplines, from biology to physics to computer science. These varying definitions are explored, with the goal of providing a broader context to how it is typically applied -- and often misapplied -- in archaeology. |